Loss of Privacy

Keeping you informed on recent losses to privacy and civil rights worldwide.

Browsing Posts tagged weapons

Between 2006 and 2008, Customs and Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers lost 243 weapons [http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/18/government.guns/index.html?hpt=T2] belonging to Homeland Security. Most of the cases involve carelessness on the part of the officers, leading to criminals to owning the weapons.

In all, 243 firearms were lost in both agencies during that period, according to the January report from Inspector General Richard Skinner. Of those, 36 were lost because of circumstances beyond officers’ control — for instance, ICE lost a firearm during an assault on an officer. Another 28 were lost even though officers had stored them in lockboxes or safes.

But 74 percent, or 179 guns, were lost “because officers did not properly secure them,” the report said.

The inspector general cited several examples of “inappropriate practices.” A customs officer, for instance, left a firearm in an idling vehicle in the parking lot of a convenience store. The vehicle was stolen while the officer was inside. “A local law enforcement officer later recovered the firearm from a suspected gang member and drug smuggler,” the report said.

Read that carefully. The vehicle was stolen while the officer was inside. These are the people that are supposed to be protecting us.

In addition, an ICE officer left an M-4 rifle and a shotgun unsecured in a closet at his home. Both weapons were stolen in a burglary and later recovered from a felon, according to the report. Another officer left his firearm in the restroom of a fast-food restaurant, and it was gone when he returned.

“Other CBP and ICE officers left firearms in places such as a fast food restaurant parking lot, a bowling alley and a clothing store,” the report said.

Of the 179 lost because of laxity, 120 were reported stolen and 59 as lost, the report said. That resulted from the agencies’ lack of guidance on a standard method for classifying and reporting lost firearms, as well as “a common perception among officers that reporting a stolen firearm was more acceptable than reporting a lost firearm.

There are two groups at fault in the loss of weapons. The officer is guilty for not taking due care to secure his/her weapon and DHS is guilty for not having set guidelines and standards for taking due care to secure weapons.

“Although CBP and ICE reported 120 firearms as stolen, our analysis showed that these firearms were lost (stolen) because officers left the firearms unsecured,” according to the report. “All 179 losses may have been prevented had the officers properly secured their firearms.”

DHS has 188,500 in listed in its possession. Losing 179 represents a 0.09% loss of weapons. While it’s a small number compared to the total, the lack of personal responsibility is still appalling. These officers are entrusted with weapons and should have taken more care to see that they were secured at all times.

TwitterRedditShare

High-Tech Guns

Comments off

Wired has an article covering some of the latest high-tech guns. One in particular is a $10,000 gun that won’t fired unless you’re wearing a special watch.

This year, the highest-tech gun belonged to Armatix. The German firm has an electronic safety that automatically disables the pistol when it’s not within a few inches of a custom wristwatch. The watch sends a wireless arming signal to the gun. If the gun is picking up a signal from the watch, a green LED on the back lights up. Try squeezing the handle without wearing the watch, and you will see a red warning light. Anyone can pick up a limited edition version of the pistol for about 7,000 euro, which is pretty steep for a .22cal plinker. They start shipping next month.

To make the weapon more effective, they should have a way of disabling the lights as you really don’t want your enemy to see where you are.

TwitterRedditShare

TwitterRedditShare

TwitterRedditShare

A new gel, called d30, hardens immediately on impact and the military hopes to use it on their helmets to help dissipate the kinetic energy from bullets and shrapnel.

The d3O gel has already expanded into a range of sporting goods and is found in ski gloves, shin guards, ballet shoe pointes and horse-riding equipment. The substance relies on “intelligent molecules” that “shock lock” together to absorb energy and create a solid pad. Once the pressure has gone they return to their normal flexible state.

The gel is stitched into clothing or equipment that is supple until it stiffens into a protective barrier on impact.

If the product is taken on by defence contractors it could be used to reduce the current bulky and restrictive armour used by troops in on the frontline with gel pads inserted into key protective areas.

Most military personnel aren’t dying from head wounds.  It’s the flying shrapnel.  The military is investing £100,000, which means that they don’t fully support the idea yet or they plan to only use it with special forces.

More information on costs is needed, as well as how well the gel works, before a final decision can truly be made.

TwitterRedditShare