Libraries are the backbone of civilization. They’ve been around since ancient times. They contain a wealth of information. Free access to books is essential for societies to thrive. Besides containing books, poor people also use it for free access to the internet. The unemployed use it for job searches and resumes. Yet, FOX news is seemingly advocating the closure of libraries to save money.
I personally think my local library is crappy. They never have what I want and I end up purchasing the books I want online. That said, every time I go to the library, there are usually 3-4 people using the computers for internet access, 5-7 children looking for books to read, and 4-5 adults looking getting books to check out. There is also a video rental system that is heavily used. The more popular titles have waitlists.
Libraries have numerous programs for children. Adults have literacy programs and cultural events. There are summer reading programs for all ages. The library saves the community thousands of dollars on items ranging from audiobooks to the latest fiction precisely because they can freely check them out and not purchase them. Libraries have access to newspapers and magazines that most people cannot afford. Libraries provide valuable research opportunities to students as well as scientists. 2.5% of property taxes in Chicago is not a large asking price for the community to pay for providing a place of learning.
To get rid of the public library is to eliminate knowledge for the masses. While some libraries might suffer some budget cuts, completely closing an avenue to free knowledge is never the answer. Politicians should look elsewhere for their money.
The video below is the evidence of shoddy journalism. Reporter Anna Dalvantes did little investigative work into exactly what the libraries are used for. Chicago borrows more than 88 million books a year, yet that doesn’t seem to be enough to Ms. Dalvantes to keep them open. She completely ignored the librarian that told her that borrowing was going up every year, thus proving that they are worthwhile. Instead, she focused on the fact that it cost $120 million to run them each year. She suggests that the money be used for schools, when Chicago already sends 60% of property taxes to education already.
There was no report on the percentage of users who use the computers for job related searches. There were no interviews with anyone from the Chicago library system. There were no suggestions for the people who can’t afford computers as to how they are supposed to afford ebook readers for the ebooks she says they should buy. The undercover reporting stated that one particular library sees 5,000 people per day, yet no questions were asked of why the people were there.
Ms. Dalvantes spent an hour in one library and randomly asked a few people on the street if they go to the library. There was no investigative journalism here. There was only support for cutting money to fund the libraries. There weren’t any interviews with people who were actually in the library using it. In depth? I hardly think so.
Technorati
Anoox

