Loss of Privacy

Keeping you informed on recent losses to privacy and civil rights worldwide.

Browsing Posts in Politics

cheney

Former vice president Dick Cheney has come out stating that, if the NSA’s surveillance program had been running during 9/11, there’s a good chance that it could have been prevented.

“As everybody who’s been associated with the program’s said, if we had had this before 9/11, when there were two terrorists in San Diego — two hijackers — had been able to use that program, that capability, against that target, we might well have been able to prevent 9/11,” Cheney said on “Fox News Sunday.”

This program didn’t stop the Boston Bombings or the Times Square Bomber. The Boston bombers were caught because they stole a car, the owner escaped and reported it. Then, the lone survivor after having shootout with the police in which his brother was killed, hid out in a boat. It was a concerned citizen who found him, despite the police having closed down the city in their search for him. NSA surveillance, PRISM and Boundless Informant did nothing to stop or even warn of what was about to happen.

All of the evidence that could have stopped 9/11 was ignored by Dick Cheney, George Bush and everyone else in Washington at the time. To say that surveillance of the internet and telephone calls would have prevented 9/11 is simply not true. The fact is, there is no way to truly know if it would have helped or hindered an investigation into the 9/11 terrorists. Dick Cheney is merely politically posturing to convince other people that government spying on citizens is a good thing.

If one remembers, there were several warnings about the exact type of attack that occurred on 9/11.

The recent congressional report on the 9/11 intelligence failures lists a dozen pre-9/11 indications that terrorists were plotting a suicide hijacking. For example, in 1994 Algerians hijacked an Air France airliner with the intention of crashing it into the Eiffel Tower. (They were tricked by French officials into landing in Marseilles to refuel, where they were overpowered.) In 1995, police in the Philippines uncovered an al-Qaida plot to fly a plane into CIA headquarters. (One of the plotters: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.) A year later, al-Qaida had the idea of flying a plane from outside the United States and crashing it into the White House. Two years later, al-Qaida planned to fly a plane from outside the United States and crash it into the World Trade Center. And so on.

Intelligence officials, who are endlessly juggling all kinds of different threats, didn’t take the suicide-plane schemes seriously because they believed there were other, more imminent dangers. But no one can say they weren’t warned.

In 2004, The National Center for Health Statistics and the U.S. Census Bureau compiled statistics that clearly showed a person is more likely to die numerous other things than a terror attack.

Taking these figures into account, a rough calculation suggests that in the last five years, your chances of being killed by a terrorist are about one in 20 million. This compares annual risk of dying in a car accident of 1 in 19,000; drowning in a bathtub at 1 in 800,000; dying in a building fire at 1 in 99,000; or being struck by lightning at 1 in 5,500,000. In other words, in the last five years you were four times more likely to be struck by lightning than killed by a terrorist.

The National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) has just published, Background Report: 9/11, Ten Years Later [PDF]. The report notes, excluding the 9/11 atrocities, that fewer than 500 people died in the U.S. from terrorist attacks between 1970 and 2010. The report adds, “From 1991-2000, the United States averaged 41.3 terrorist attacks per year. After 2001, the average number of U.S. attacks decreased to 16 per year from 2002-2010.”

Americans also need to stop listening to Dick Cheney, who had a lot to gain by going to war in Iraq and Afghanistan. 9/11 could have only been prevented by actually reading and acting on the briefs and memos given to people like Cheney as well as simply listening to those in the intelligence community. By Dick Cheney’s logic, the NSA’s spying could have prevented the American Revolution too.

Photo.

flattr this!

5KWnNUU

Source.

flattr this!

Source.

flattr this!

The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement is being negotiated in secret between more than 12 countries around the Pacific region. Find out why it’s the biggest threat to the Internet you’ve probably never heard of.

For more information and to find out how you can take action, visit the EFF.

flattr this!

Last week, the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Forces conducted hearings entitled Oversight: The Law of Armed Conflict, the Use of Military Force, and the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force in which the Pentagon admitted that we are in an endless war against terrorism.

Senator Angus King tells the Pentagon officials that they have essentially rewritten the constitution.

Pentagon officials today claimed President Obama and future presidents have the power to send troops anywhere in the world to fight groups linked to al-Qaeda, based in part on the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), passed by Congress days after the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. Speaking at the first Senate hearing on rewriting the AUMF, Pentagon officials specifically said troops could be sent to Syria, Yemen and the Congo without new congressional authorization. Michael Sheehan, the assistant secretary of defense for special operations and low-intensity conflict, predicted the war against al-Qaeda would last at least 10 to 20 more years. Senator Angus King (I-Maine) challenged the Pentagon’s interpretation of the Constitution and that the entire world is a battlefield. “This is the most astounding and most astoundingly disturbing hearing I’ve been to since I’ve been here. You guys have essentially rewritten the Constitution here today,” King said. “You guys have invented this term ‘associated forces’ that’s nowhere in this document. … It’s the justification for everything, and it renders the war powers of Congress null and void.”

Read more at Common Dreams and Democracy Now!

flattr this!